<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polemics for adults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wmwmsblog.com/2008/10/polemics-for-adults/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wmwmsblog.com/2008/10/polemics-for-adults/</link>
	<description>Rarely senselessly vulgar; frequently slightly tacky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Chili</title>
		<link>http://wmwmsblog.com/2008/10/polemics-for-adults/comment-page-1/#comment-12659</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Chili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1045#comment-12659</guid>
		<description>PERFECT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PERFECT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo</title>
		<link>http://wmwmsblog.com/2008/10/polemics-for-adults/comment-page-1/#comment-12649</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1045#comment-12649</guid>
		<description>Buzzregog:  I&#039;ll just make it here.

1.  The government shouldn&#039;t be involved in marriage whatsoever.

2.  As long as they are, and as long as there is any legal and/or logistical advantage to being married, said advantage should extend to same-sex couples.

How&#039;s that?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzzregog:  I&#8217;ll just make it here.</p>
<p>1.  The government shouldn&#8217;t be involved in marriage whatsoever.</p>
<p>2.  As long as they are, and as long as there is any legal and/or logistical advantage to being married, said advantage should extend to same-sex couples.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that?  <img src='http://wmwmsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzzregog</title>
		<link>http://wmwmsblog.com/2008/10/polemics-for-adults/comment-page-1/#comment-12637</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzzregog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1045#comment-12637</guid>
		<description>I think you should cover the whole ball of wax and make a post on Prop 8. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should cover the whole ball of wax and make a post on Prop 8. <img src='http://wmwmsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Chili</title>
		<link>http://wmwmsblog.com/2008/10/polemics-for-adults/comment-page-1/#comment-12626</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Chili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1045#comment-12626</guid>
		<description>I feel so much better now that I understand that you didn&#039;t think *I* was calling you out as a racist.  I was kind of killing myself over this.

I do think these conversations are important to have, and I also agree with you that, ESPECIALLY in conversations like these, the rules of polite conversation have to be fastidiously observed.  It&#039;s just too easy for things like this to go bad in a hurry, as evidenced by my misunderstanding of your response to my blog post.

Love you!

Chili</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel so much better now that I understand that you didn&#8217;t think *I* was calling you out as a racist.  I was kind of killing myself over this.</p>
<p>I do think these conversations are important to have, and I also agree with you that, ESPECIALLY in conversations like these, the rules of polite conversation have to be fastidiously observed.  It&#8217;s just too easy for things like this to go bad in a hurry, as evidenced by my misunderstanding of your response to my blog post.</p>
<p>Love you!</p>
<p>Chili</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Rosser</title>
		<link>http://wmwmsblog.com/2008/10/polemics-for-adults/comment-page-1/#comment-12598</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Rosser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmwmsblog.com/?p=1045#comment-12598</guid>
		<description>Name-calling is pretty lame, and I&#039;m one who should know!

I think in any dialogue certain &quot;scary words&quot; get thrown in, and I&#039;m not the only offender. The real problem comes when one (like who?) fails to resist the temptation to do it in response (like the retaliator in a football dustup usually gets the penalty flag).

Sometimes it is easier to apply a label to someone, or something, than it is to make a detailed, reasonable statement. In my case, it usually amounts to pure laziness (of which I have a strong streak). 

Arguments couched &quot;ad hominem&quot; never reflect well on the person making them, all the way from us members of the hoi polloi to candidates for the highest office in the land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name-calling is pretty lame, and I&#8217;m one who should know!</p>
<p>I think in any dialogue certain &#8220;scary words&#8221; get thrown in, and I&#8217;m not the only offender. The real problem comes when one (like who?) fails to resist the temptation to do it in response (like the retaliator in a football dustup usually gets the penalty flag).</p>
<p>Sometimes it is easier to apply a label to someone, or something, than it is to make a detailed, reasonable statement. In my case, it usually amounts to pure laziness (of which I have a strong streak). </p>
<p>Arguments couched &#8220;ad hominem&#8221; never reflect well on the person making them, all the way from us members of the hoi polloi to candidates for the highest office in the land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
