Archive for the 'Politics' Category

Passing Obamacare without another House vote? It could happen

Hey, you want to know what happens next?  How about the House “deeming” the health care bill passed without ever voting on it?  Read that again, to make sure you’ve got it.

House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is weighing preparing a rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version.  Read this post to The Corner, and then this one.

Now, never mind that House rules are supposed to set term for debate, not policy.

(Add that to your “never mind that Senate reconciliation is supposed to apply to budgetary matters, not policy.”)

Here it comes, ladies and gentlemen—Obamacare shoved right up your ass, without a drop of K-Y (or any of that pesky voting stuff).

The Democrats are about to pass “health care reform” without voting on it.

Sacrifice 2010 for the greater “good”?

President Obama gathered some more prop white-coated doctors this week for a speech.

(Loved them being on stage with him this time, like they were going to grab him and head for a rubber room as soon as the speech was over.  “That was a very good speech, Barack!  Let’s go for a nice walk!”)

Anyway, it seems he was making an impassioned case for “health care reform.”  (Did you know he was interested in doing that?  It’s so hard to know what’s on our esteemed president’s mind.  He’s so shy and quiet.)

As reliably grounded and insightful as Mark Steyn usually is, I read a column of his several months ago that made me think he might be losing it.  Essentially, he said that he thought the Democrats might sacrifice the 2010 election to pass “health care reform,” spend a few years out of power, and their orgy of socialism would be waiting for them when they returned, because the Republicans wouldn’t have the stones to repeal it.

Having heard at the tender age of 17 from a smart man that an elected official’s top priority was getting reelected, and having reliably found in the intervening two-plus decades that almost all elected officials’ behavior was entirely consistent with that assertion, I thought Steyn was nuts.  No way would today’s bunch of nitwits fall on their swords for a bunch of anonymous nitwits at some unknown point in the near future.

Then Nancy Pelosi held up a ladle of delicious, refreshing grape Flavor Aid to her fellow Democrats.  Quoting this story:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urged her colleagues to back a major overhaul of U.S. health care even if it threatens their political careers, a call to arms that underscores the issue’s massive role in this election year.

Lawmakers sometimes must enact policies that, even if unpopular at the moment, will help the public, Pelosi said in an interview being broadcast Sunday the ABC News program “This Week.”  “We’re not here just to self-perpetuate our service in Congress,” she said. “We’re here to do the job for the American people.”

(Incidentally, when I Googled Nancy Pelosi just now to find that quote, one of Google’s guesses was “nancy pelosi breasts.”  What the hell is wrong with you people?)

And Mr. Steyn is hammering it again in this weekend’s column, and its plausibility and eminent reasonableness makes it a chilling read:

Republicans are good at keeping the seat warm. A bigtime GOP consultant was on TV crowing that Republicans wanted the Dems to pass Obamacare because it’s so unpopular it will guarantee a GOP sweep in November. Okay, then what? You’ll roll it back — like you’ve rolled back all those other unsustainable entitlements premised on cobwebbed actuarial tables from 80 years ago? Like you’ve undone the federal Department of Education and of Energy and all the other nickel ’n’ dime novelties of even a universally reviled one-term loser like Jimmy Carter? Andrew McCarthy concluded a shrewd analysis of the political realities thus: “Health care is a loser for the Left only if the Right has the steel to undo it. The Left is banking on an absence of steel. Why is that a bad bet?”

Why indeed?

If I had to commit one way or the other, I think I’d still say there aren’t enough members of Congress who will think that largely.  They’ll feel the pinch, and vote self-preservation.  Let’s hope so.  I think if we can get this omnibus nonsense turned back one more time, it’ll be enough for the foreseeable future.

Hoping Obamacare’s Waterloo is imminent

It’s been a while since I have, but I’m pretty weary of blogging about Obamacare.  Hopefully there will soon be little further need.

Our esteemed president, despite the opposition of a substantial majority of American citizens, is bringing essentially the failed Senate plan to Thursday’s “health care summit.”  Moreover, there are rumblings that he and Harry Reid are willing to use the budget reconciliation process to get it through the Senate, thereby requiring only a simple majority and not a filibuster-proof majority of 60, which was lost when Republican Scott Brown won Kennedy’s old Senate seat.

(Still feels weird to type that, but there it is.)

None of this should be surprising.  It’s a gigantic “fuck you” to the American people, and surely it is now obvious to even the most casual observer that Barack Obama is a “fuck you” kind of guy.

(No, I have that wrong.  It’s that you don’t appreciate what he’s trying to do for you, you stupid son-of-a-bitch.)

The president’s “summit” is not a good faith effort to negotiate.  This should be clear not only from the aforementioned lack of real change in the proposal, but in the steady stream of lies issuing from places like the White House web site and Robert Gibbs’ cakehole (“Republicans have no alternative plans” being the most blatantly dishonest claim).

Instead, it’s a trap, but a simply laid one, and rather late in the game, assuming the 2010 elections are as significantly negative for the Democrats as anticipated.  Let’s have a good and principled showing, and here’s hoping enough senators’ self-interests prevail and turn this affront to liberty and responsibility back one more time.

“The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal.”

Today, dear readers, I invite you to enjoy one of my favorite short stories:  Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. If you have read it already, please reread it.  (It’ll be good again.  I promise.)

It will take you 10 or 15 minutes at the most, but it will stay with you for the rest of your life.  It’s here.  Enjoy.

I hope you’re having a good weekend.

No new taxes on families making less than $250,000 (well, unless we really need them)

During the campaign Barack Obama made many, many promises.  He’s a hopey-changey guy, and hopey-changey guys do that.  He is the one we’ve been waiting for.

Oh, but shucksdarnitalltohell, it turns out that on the ground, he’s exactly the same old rotten politician SOB, made worse by generous ladlings of Chicago strongarm mentality and arrogance.

But you’ll have that.

Nevertheless, if you remember anything our esteemed president promised, you’ll probably remember this:

“I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.” – Barack Obama, September 12, 2008

Now, here he is discussing deficit reduction in a recent interview with BusinessWeek:

“The whole point of it is to make sure that all ideas are on the table.  So what I want to do is to be completely agnostic, in terms of solutions.” – Barack Obama, February 9, 2010

If you just weren’t feeling the hope and change yet, sports fans, here it comes.  Bend over.






WmWms is using WP-Gravatar