Archive for the 'Professional' Category

Remembering the language of car sales

I used to sell cars.  I’ve written of it a time or two, though not in a long while.  There were about 20 months between when my life as a college student ended and my life as a technical writer began, and for some of those months I sold Acuras.

I graduated from college in the spring of 1992, which made me one of the last to earn a degree with, essentially, no World Wide Web.  It was just barely there, and there was almost nothing on it.  Huge swaths of a college student’s life today bear no resemblance at all to the experience I had.

I bring that up because the timing of the rise of the Web had a lot to do with the way I was trained to sell cars, as well.  Buying and selling cars now is worlds apart from the way it was, even those 16 or 17 short years ago.  All of the information is available everywhere.  Margins have shrunk.  There are basically no bad new cars for sale.  There is still salesmanship, good and bad, to navigate, but the buyer has benefited from an information-generated power shift that is likely permanent.

But way back in the summer of 1993, when I sat for my sales training, I got it old-school and in-your-face from a grizzled veteran.  To be sure, I got a lot of valuable human relations training as well, but the way I was taught to sell cars was with time-honored, “classic” techniques—the “let me check with my boss” routine and what-not.  (I really did have to check with my boss, by the way.  In some ways, I was as much a pawn as you were.)

Mind, I have little doubt cars are still sold that way every hour of every day.  You have to be the car dick and fight with some people.  There’s a certain kind of 50-60ish jackass redneck who requires you to argue and raise hell, and if you don’t, he’ll go buy from someone who will.  I’m just saying it’s not the only way (or even the dominant way) it’s done anymore.

I got to chuckling today thinking about the euphemisms we used to employ.  We had a list of taboo words, and the words we were supposed to say instead.

  • We didn’t talk about a car’s price; we talked about its market value.
  • I would never ask you “what kind of payments can you afford?”  Rather, I would say “what type of monthly budget were you considering?”  (The right answer there, of course, is “I’m not thinking of payments; we’ll negotiate the bottom line.”)  If, instead, you named a number (as probably two-thirds of you did), then my immediate response would be “Up to what?”
  • We never “allowed” you a dollar amount on your trade-in.  Rather, “this is what we’re paying you for your car.”
  • I always talked to my boss, not my manager.  If I tell you I’m talking to my manager, you might think “well, I wonder who his manager is?”  Boss has a lot more finality to it.
  • The stereotype is “what do I have to do to get you in this car today?”  The reality was “you will own this car now when the figures are agreeable.  Is that correct, Mr. Prospect?”
  • It crawled into the official paperwork lingo, too.  What is a “capital cost reduction” on a lease agreement?  How about a “down payment”?

(And so forth.)

Once I was sharing some of this on a visit to my mother’s, and her husband cockily announced “you know, none of that stuff ever works on me.”  Well, of course not, man.  When I’m sitting here and laying it out point by point for you, it’s easy to say you wouldn’t be influenced by it.  It’s like the magician beginning the conversation by showing you the false floor in the cabinet, dig?

I’ll stop here for now, but I’ll have a post or two more on this soon.  Even though a lot of what I was taught seems a little antiquated and corny now, I also learned a lot of great things about understanding motivations, behavioral triggers, and so forth (that dovetailed nicely with my academic training, actually) that have remained valuable to me.

I have no desire to go back and do it again—it’s a stressful and brutally long-houred job, even when it’s going well—but I’m certain I’d be much better at it today than I was as a green-gilled 22-year-old.  (And I didn’t suck then, baby.  Heh.)

Have it your way

My colleague announced about 10:15 this morning that she was going to Burger King, and could she pick me up anything?  How sweet is that?

I had already planned to work through, but it did sound good, so I caved.  Whopper with cheese and onion rings, please.  Thank you.

It was delicious.  Then I (nearly idly) went to the Burger King web site to see how much damage I had done, and wound up having a great time.

See, Burger King has this page on which you can add and subtract ingredients for a sandwich, and it updates the nutrition information (and photo) dynamically, and there are not nearly as many application constraints as there should be.

For example, who knew a Whopper could be so low-cal?

bk1

Give me one with every sort of patty in the joint:

bk2

I’ll have the instant massive cardiac arrest, Jeeves:

bk3

You can stack it right off the page and approach 15,000 calories, if you like.  I stayed with what I could capture for the post.

Click here to build your burger.  Enjoy.

“It’s just all so terribly romantic…”

About ten years ago, at a more bad than good job, I met Brent.  We were never close friends, but I traveled and worked with him enough to get to know him a bit.

Brent was, and is, an imposing fellow.  I’d guess he’s 6′3″ and perhaps 240 lbs., but not at all overweight—just a big guy.  He has classically attractive chiseled features, and a big booming voice that brings instant credibility to anything that comes out of his mouth.  I’m (thankfully) not wired for a lot of envy, but I envied that.  Brent could tell you the weather forecast, and you’d pay it more mind than you would the president talking about a nuclear attack.

He occasionally played it for laughs, which is closing on my point (promise).  Once Charlie and I were out on the sidewalk discussing a project.  He came up behind us, put a hand on each of our backs, and said “gentlemen, I’ve been doing a little research.  I’ve examined the findings, and I’ve talked to upper management.  I think there just might be something to this World Wide Web thing.”

Heh.  Thanks, Brent.

So this was also right around the time our esteemed president decided it was a good idea to place his penis in Monica Lewinsky’s mouth, and Brent loved that too.  He’d come up and say “you know, for me, sanfordthe tragic thing that’s being lost in this whole Monica Lewinsky scandal is that it’s just all so terribly romantic.” Heh again.  It was good for a laugh because it was so ridiculous.

Funny how the humor of a decade ago becomes the reality of today.

We know, thanks to an excruciatingly lengthy hand-wringing press conference, as well as multiple embarrassing emails, that South Carolina governor Mark Sanford has had an Argentinian mistress.  I applauded his wife’s absence at the press conference, and greatly appreciated what she has had to say about trying to put her family back together, and screw his political career.  That’s awesomely good sense about what really matters, and it’s too rare anymore.

Except Rush was talking today about how gaga some folks are about the dear governor’s love letters.  “The man was a real romantic with a knack for writing,” gushes “romance coach” Leslie Karsner.  The Associated Press can’t wait for you to know that “South Carolina Governor Tells AP that Mistress Is His Soulmate.”  Any words from anyone about the sanctity of marriage (well, besides his wife)?

Well, the usually-wise Mona Charen did ask “how about avoiding adultery?“  But I mean, hell, she’s a fringe lunatic conservative.

Knowing when to walk away

I was pushing hard to finish a project at work tonight.  I doubted that I could put it all the way to bed before I left, but if possible, I wanted to face just housekeeping (cleaning up unused files, that kind of thing) when I went in tomorrow morning.

Well, it didn’t work out that way.  Best laid plans, and all that.  About 20 minutes before I was planning to leave, my project threw me a curve.  I wasn’t happy about it, but it didn’t upset me to nearly the degree it would have ten years ago.  Tonight, I recognized it as something that I didn’t know how to solve immediately, but for which a solution would emerge.

And indeed, I’ve got it now, barely an hour later.  I know exactly what I’m going to do with it when I go in tomorrow.  The best part is that I didn’t have to do anything but see it as that kind of problem—one that my subconscious would nibble at until I got it, rather than one that would respond to primary mental horsepower.

No one taught me to do that, and I didn’t explicitly teach myself to do that.  I don’t know how I could if I wanted to, really.  It’s just something that has come with age and experience.  It’s having a taste of a problem, realizing that it’s that certain flavor, and walking away from it.  It’s one of the things that keeps me from saying I’d like to go back in time and relive childhood or young adulthood when those questions pop up on pass-arounds.

Apart from the obvious things, like watching my boys grow, it’s also the kind of thing that makes me think the best years really are ahead.

Competitive, focused Melanie

I had a particularly delicious bowl of pho with Melanie today, thereby inaugurating 2009 as the seventh different calendar year in which we’ve enjoyed Viet Huong together.  Burned out on Vietnamese food?  Who, us?  Not yet.

melI threatened to tell a story on her today, and I don’t think she believed me, so here goes.

I’ve mentioned that Melanie was my mentor before she was my close friend.  Way back in 1994, she was an experienced writer, and I was the green bean out of school, and I watched her very closely.  The convergence of her deep focus and her competitive nature was, and is, almost savantlike.

This pays big dividends in software development and associated activities.  She’s still the best diagnostician I’ve ever known.  However, for leisure pursuits, it can be a heavy burden indeed.

Five or so years ago, I received a link to an online multiple-choice IQ test, and being a competitive sort myself, I started taking it.  I got to question 150 or so, and noticed that the questions I was getting were reworked versions of earlier questions I had already answered.  I pressed on, thinking it was evaluating me for consistency.

At question 250, I’d had enough, and closed the test.  A pop-up informed me that the whole thing was having me on, simply seeing how far I’d go before throwing it in.  It told me I hung in longer than 70% of the population would have.  I felt like a dolt.

Then, of course, I sent it to Melanie.  She’d want badly to “win,” and of all the potential “victims” that passed through me head, I thought she’d be the one most likely to go as far as I had.

When I went down to see if she wanted to have lunch, she was on question 971.






WmWms is using WP-Gravatar