The Restoring Honor rally, headlined by Glenn Beck, was held at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on Saturday.  The most pessimistic, and ridiculed, attendance estimate comes from CBS, who said 87,000.  Most other estimates are considerably higher.

In any case, a bunch of folks, dig?

Now there is much to be said about the rally’s content, and it will surprise no regular reader of this blog that I find a lot of agreement with this crowd.  I have never been more concerned for my country, and I’m thoroughly confident Mr. Beck, Mrs. Palin, and their supporters have a lot more of the answers that will genuinely restore America’s greatness than do Mr. Obama and his supporters.

So there’s a post in that, for sure.  However, I’m not going to write it.  Tens of thousands of bloggers already have, and as I mentioned above, there is no shortage on WmWms of what I think about the current state of things.

Many have also posted about the level of trash left by the Restoring Honor attendees, and I am going to join that chorus, because it ties in with something I discussed previously.  Have a look at the Mall, post-rally:

Wow, what a bunch of careless swine!  Can you believe that enormous mess they left?  But what else would you expect from that slack-jawed drooling bunch of hicks who pray to invisible men in the sky and hate black people, right?

I really enjoyed this little data point, because it reminded me of when I posted about how surprised “everyone” seemed at how well-behaved the Obama inauguration crowd was.  Didn’t surprise me at all.  By and large, the folks who would cause a scene with base or boorish behavior were happy.  It’s no more complicated than that.  As then, so now.

Now I’m certainly not saying to my liberal friends that, solely by virtue of their politics, they’re disruptive slobs.  I am, however, asserting that a disruptive slob in such an environment is likely to be liberal.

Oh, and I’ll throw a link back to this post in for good measure, in case there’s any nonsense about “poisonous rhetoric” or similar.

How long until November 2?  Here we come.  Boo!

Now Nancy Pelosi says the opposition to the Ground Zero mosque is an organized conspiracy that needs to be investigated.

70% of the American population opposes it.  That’s quite a conspiracy, Nancy.

Ladies and gentlemen, the legal questions are boring, and worse, they’re not the point.  It’s not a question of law; it’s a question of manners (or propriety, as Andrew McCarthy puts it below).

No one credibly questions the legal right of Muslim landowners to use their property in any lawful fashion. Legality is an irrelevant issue, even if the back-tracking Obama now wants to pretend it is the only one he was really talking about on Friday night. The question here is propriety.

That’s a fine piece, by the way.  Read the whole thing here.

Of course, the president is beyond hopeless on this.  It was politically wise to keep his mouth shut, and it’s already amply in evidence that he’s not politically wise, so no surprise that he voted “present” when he opined.  (His approval rating is down to 41% as I write, by the way.)

I suppose it’s at least somewhat unfashionable to say it out loud, but even mainstream Islam is deeply intolerant of many things we consider customary and usual in the United States.  Moreover, it is much more mainstream than radical Islam thought that said prohibitions must reign, even (especially?) when they conflict with secular law.

Remember though, this mosque will build bridges!

For all of the soulless nitwits wringing their hands and fretting about who can demonstrate the most sensitivity, Muslims enjoy a tremendous amount of freedom to practice their religion in the United States.  This is freedom most everyone embraces without even trivial further thought, much less any consideration of reciprocity.  (Hey, who’s up for some Christian missionary work in Saudi Arabia?)

I welcome the courageous Muslim voices speaking out against the Ground Zero mosque (and there are some).  Of particular note:

This is not a humble Islamic statement. A mosque such as this is actually a political structure that casts a shadow over a cemetery. [The Mosque] is going to be used around the world, especially in Islamic media. From the ashes of this destruction comes the flourishing of Islam and I think that is just the wrong message. It is not good for America or for Muslims…We are Americans who happen to be Muslims, not Muslims who happen to be Americans.

From sunup to sundown Muslims are fasting and working on putting our needs tertiary to our God and our country, not what we need. They are abandoning these principles and saying, ‘Well, this is what we need and we are victims if you don’t let us do this. And we can do it, so we are going to.’ I think that is un-Islamic. – Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, president and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Bravo, sir.  Your words are potentially very costly, and you have my utmost respect for uttering them anyway.  Thank you.

Like it or not, that is irrefutable. It was radical Islam, for sure.  It was a strain of Islam alien to most adherents. Of course that strain represents only a minority of Muslims. Islam is no more intrinsically Islamist than present-day Germany is Nazi — yet despite contemporary Germany’s innocence, no German of good will [...]

Both boys rang in their fall AYSO seasons this morning at 8:30.  Nathan has graduated to a level where I don’t get to visit with him at all during the game.  Before, when he was idle for a quarter, he was able to sit with me.  Now, the teams are on the opposite sideline.  Childhood’s [...]

Happily married means no Plan B

I used to enjoy listening to Dr. Laura at work.  I didn’t always agree with her, and given that a big part of her shtick is being an insufferably annoying pain in the ass, I’d generally listen a day or two and then take a day or two off. Whenever she’d take a call from [...]

© 2010 WmWms Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha

WmWms is using WP-Gravatar